Thermal vs night vision reddit. Near infrared is a little bit redder than red.
Thermal vs night vision reddit The night vision could be promising as long as they get the tiny bit of perceivable latency taken care of before it hits production in December. That’s one big advantage of night vision being integrated into your setup. If they don't have fusion devices by the time I buy duals then I'm getting an ecoti. Detection range for thermal is solely depending on the core the device has and can range from 50m to 1000m+. Binoculars work well for night vision because they aid depth perception during movement when helmet mounted. High magnification requires a very high sensor resolutio View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. In my experience, night vision for navigation & thermal for spotting/targeting. Stumbled on an active coyote den the other night I wouldn't of found without hmt. Maybe that’s just my experience. For one, with thermal I’ve often noticed a bit of a lag. However, I am also tempted by the versatility that an thermal device and the ability to also use the pvs-14 alone (with an magifying objective for example) could bring me. The good thing about night vision is that it loses very little value. For instance, the primary way you shoot/point at things when using light amplifying night vision is with a powerful IR laser. I could write arguably the best night vision that could exist: Quad nod style housing that's lighter than the current GPNVG housing Digital: with <1ms lag, full color, 4K+ resolution, 240Hz+ refresh rate, same sensitivity for low light as unfilmed L3 tubes, GPS + compass, wide bandwith spectrum of approx 300-1500nm, recording and overall HUD (pretty much all the features that the Sionyx Opsin If we’re talking about thermal, than no. T7 Thermal vs NPVG Night Vission of anyone without affecting your own vision at all Both are going to have their uses. NV first, then thermal. If you have to do thermal at that range and are stuck with that budget, then abandon your plan for a clip-on and get a dedicated thermal with a manual focus. What are you guys thoughts on running something like a pvs-14 and thermal on a rayvn bridge, like the sidekick 640, MH25 (with pvs-14 eye peice conversion), or RH25. They’re using very different parts of the spectrum of light. Digital night vision is just a camera with no NIR filter. I use thermal scope, because your zoom doesn’t really matter if your render distance is low anyways, and the thermal lets you see past your render distance, I run thermal scope, but then when I go to use my marksman rifle I always use thermal helmet, I think it’s a good idea to use both, and have an outfit saved with goggles What i noticed the most when transitioning to duals was that everything was a lot more natural, i felt like "i had night vision" and with monos i felt like "i was looking through night vision", so even in really low light situations when the tubes are not performing really well it is easier to identify stuff. Spend the money on a good PVS/mount/helmet/IR designator THEN look at thermal monoculars. Starter: I have been in thermal world for three years now. Or check it out in the app stores Thermal vs Digital Night Vision🌕 Two Budget Friendly Options Currently run duals and have a Thermal clip on 640 and a cheaper handheld scanner for Yote hunting. That said, you have a ton of flexibility with this setup as you can swap in a PVS-14, replacing the MH25 for a typical Panobridge setup. But unless you have paid big, big bucks for a top end device, it generally isn't great at identifying features. Most people seem to prefer the green over white, which is funny because that's the opposite to the way it goes with analog night vision. So no shooting. Thermal does not amplify light meaning that you won't see anything useful when looking at the stars. Digital night vision cannot see heat. When it comes to spotting/shooting live things at night, night vision just doesn't hold a candle. Are you going with a thermal clip-on like the Trijicon SNIPE-IR or the KAC UNS-TS, or are you going with a night vision option like the PVS-30 or PVS 27? A cheap thermal monocular for CBQ distances makes a HUGE difference, but NV is more capable if someone is more limited in what they can buy. Thermal binos do exist but not a lot of companies make them. NV is better at picking up small details but can struggle to detect obscured objects. Digital nv scopes suffer the same problems that digital handhelds suffer. Most people would be better off buying two thermal devices, a handheld wide FOV scanner and a dedicated thermal weapon sight, or at least a clip-on which will stay on the rifle throughout the hunt. Honestly not a bad idea. From what I heard, though, I thought the NVG-10 was really 1x. Digital will just be cheaper and easier to use, not to mention the other things that it brings to the table such as color, HUD, recording, GPS etc. I understand the pros being that the pvs 14 gives you a hands free way to move around at night. Let’s say you have infinite money to spend on a clip-on device for your day scope to be able to shoot at night (let’s say for hunting/sniping), and that you want to shoot at 1,000 yards or so. From the shotshow videos I thought I heard that the heat detection was less than 75 feet… It takes a little bit of adjustment and training to get used to the dual band image - it’s not for everyone and I wouldn’t recommend it as a beginner setup out of the gate as a first night vision purchase. So any information I can get on pros and cons of either set up/information in general about set up would be much appreciated! Thanks! a friend of mine uses the jerry on left eye to avoid the passive aiming issue as its really only for detection anyways. Just keep in mind, you won’t be able to use any IR lasers with a thermal bino setup. I prefer night vision 99% of the time. Really depends on what you are wanting to do with it. NEW… Thermal provides rapid detection and in some cases can allow for PID. US's one would confuse me a lot, it looks really unnatural and over saturated. I’m not interested in a thermal scope and would like to stick with my laser setup to keep my setup utilitarian for multiple uses. It's a common problem with digital, that the zoom is often not a true 1x like analog night vision. Most things I have read all lean towards a pvs 14 first for a prepper. If by skywatching you mean looking at stars, a thermal device is useless. Thermal/nvg on a bridge vs nvg + coti It seems to me like the nvg community is moving more towards thermal in conjunction with night vision. Unless it's a console only thing, that's not true. Although bino thermal probably helps. First being it's less effective at spotting an animal and second for a setup that would suit your needs you would at minimum need to quadruple your budget. I will start with giving my current view. But that's just me. Most folks when they upgrade to binos will retain a PVS14 for backup or as a spare for their friends/family. breach i think has too many issues to be worth it imo. NV amplifies light and gathers non-visible light. The thermal is the most exciting but I’ll be purchasing all 3 to test. 161 votes, 33 comments. So I mainly want to use my night vision device almost exclusively for walking/navigating etc. As thermals by themselves are hard to navigate with because usually most things in your environment will be relatively the same temperature, causing a very low detail image. Night vision vs thermal for security purposes in shtf. Thermal uses far-infrared (not like the near-infrared that night vision might use. Thermal rifle scopes are neat, but suffer from latency, frame rate, and all the other downsides of digital devices, plus, they cant see through glass. I haven’t bridged a monocular yet, I’m waiting for the new wave of thermal fusion systems to hit the market in the relatively near future. Near infrared is a little bit redder than red. Hell, It's so cool turning night into day and heat into glowing signatures I've barely even hunted, mostly just walk around gawking at shit. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Are you ever wanting to put this on a rifle or have the option to? What budget is your max? We field test every thermal/ night vision device before making the decision to sell to our customers. I would say the Nox 35 is a better dedicated thermal sight than the RH25, and the Nox 18 is a better helmet-mounted thermal than the RH25, but the RH25 is the best choice if you need one unit to do both things okay, plus it can be a low-power clip-on. Having run both binos, monoculars, and bridged mono/thermal, I’d have to say that i like the monocular for weight savings but binos will of course have superior peripheral and depth perception. Just sold my last older FLIR system. IR NV is superior for navigating terrain/wood in the dark. Plus you can flex on them hoes. Below 4k msrp is where I’m trying to be, I know that puts a damper on the best options out there. Night vision that amplifies light is fundamentally different than thermal imaging. This does mean that night vision can work with light that your eyes normally couldn't see, like near-infrared or ultraviolet. It's more effective to combine thermals ontop of night vision. People crying about delay in digital night vision but for digital thermal with low FPS and lag it's okay. I'd honestly recommend going that route if you do eventually want to upgrade to duals. You go to turn your head and it takes the image a second to catch up. You need a night vision device for this. Typically with thermal, your scanning in a static position, so a monocular tends to be just fine. Yes, but for airsoft night vision + coti is better, ive run that setup and its a lot better because you dont need to take shots past 100M really in airsoft and thats where a coti outshines a dedicated thermal scope, quick detection around you inside 200 m or so… with a thermal scope you are a lot slower and constantly need to scan with your gun Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I am interested in either purchasing a helmet mounted thermal to bridge with my 14 or a clip on thermal like a Jerry CE5. Better off moving with the NV and periodically scanning with a handheld thermal. Planning for my next thermals to have edge detection! 😁👍 Dec 16, 2023 · Thermal is excellent for detection but is difficult to navigate with. NVGs do alot of the same with a clearer picture and no heat vision. So with that in mind binos do seem like the better option for me. Welcome to r/NightVision, a place for people who like to see in the dark. Looking at a digital screen isn’t as natural as the pass-through system of IIT night vision. Together you have rapid signature detection and identification. If you have to shoot that far on that budget, just get the PVS-30 you were considering. Night hog hunting is on the docket but it will be a fairly rare occasion (few times a year). Unless you live in a giant mansion i doubt anybody would have enough time to put on a helmet, turn NV on, adjust helmet for NV, then get your Home defense weapon of choice. My plan would be to pull the eotech off and put on a thermal that would allow me to either run with night vision if I want with a laser, or flip up and be able to come down on thermal after target acquisition. Thermal is great for spotting obviously and does good for shooting. It's not allowed to use logic in this subreddit! Logic and common sense, the forbidden fruit of the NV Subreddit. Nor is it true night vision in the sense of just seeing everything. ) Near vs far infrared is a difference in color. Also night time target shooting on steel for fun. Not to mention, it's awkward trying to spot with a monocular and then clip it onto the weapon in the dark without making noise. Traditional analog devices are becoming antique, even though they are working the best to this day. Midnight Mac: a shit show, Middle-of-the -mall night vision 9mm hood False, color night vision is the future. Would love to hear feedback and discussion. They both appear to be thermal overlay over analog night vision, especially the chinese one. The thermal scope has 'fog' that comes up at a range which limits it to a degree, it doesn't allow you to see further because player render distance is entirely based on scope zoom level - the advanced scope isn't enough of a zoom increase to render a player that was prior not visible, and I GUARANTEE you what you were seeing was player render First we have digital night vision. One that can do double duty as spotting scope/weapon scope, and get a decent IR monocular, Gen 2 at least…for getting around. . This will also help you avoid cooking through batteries on the thermal really fast for no reason. This is probably a question for the night vision sub but yall are funnier, you can walk around with thermals, like nods, and FLIR comes with "cheeper" monocular options (the scout) and front rifle attachments. TLDW - basically thermal is OP and might just edge out IIT night vision as the king of night vision capability. Stay away. Planning for my next thermals to have edge detection! 😁👍 Thermal is excellent for detection but is difficult to navigate with. Night vision is going to be your primary identification method. This was a game changer for us in the GWOT years because early on we had to have a separate rifle dedicated for night fighting. We assemble DTNVS, RNVG, PVS-14s and have highly respected dealers on here as well. A used FLIR PTS736 would do nicely. really looking into helmet mounted to bridge with a 14 for just scanning to identify only since the recent price drop on the StingIr series 2400 beans or a armasight 384 for 2k cant swing the 640 because of budget just wondering if anyone has I had some hands on with all 3 systems at Shot Show and I’m excited. 57K subscribers in the NightVision community. I didn’t realize that was a link to the night vision threads. Clip-ons mount in front of your day scope, essentially turning it into a night vision scope. Handheld is better IMOP because the refresh rate rate on a thermal will make it harder to walk around. I am excited about this because it fits a niche that a thermal scope is just too heavy and more than what I want on this particular rifle. Feb 2, 2020 · Does high summer heat and humidity effect the choice of NV vs Thermal? I’ve been reading for a few months now, trying to decide what’s best for my needs Feb 1, 2022 · What I would like to know from guys that have used NV and or Thermal much more than I have, what is a good setup for coyote hunting mostly open fields some woods at night? Jan 19, 2024 · I think thermal is superior to conventional IR NV for spotting living targets. Thermal has been around and there weren't many upgrades 500m is how far you can see with the optic… how far can the optic detect heat movement…that’s the question… I think some people don’t understand that it’s a night vision, thermal,thermal pro … so they are mixing some of the details up…. I know the land I hunt well enough to navigate in the darkness with occasional checks through the thermal but it does get tiresome. Thanks. I was originally leaning towards PVS14s but then I saw how thermals detect so much more. I hunt pigs primarily and majority of my shots are with ARs 75 yards and in. Similar, but the Skeetir is pretty much an excellent monocular that can handle light clip on use. This is what night vision security cameras are. Whether a bino setup and ecoti would be better? The color setting is a nice option. They can see into the NIR spectrum, and can be used in conjunction with NIR illuminators to see in the dark. Thermal is amazing for spotting living creatures, or heat sources. I would like to hunt with it out to 150-200 yards. With night vision I can lasso something and the guy next to me can see what I’m trying to show him, not with thermal. TLDR/research your optic of choice, plenty of videos on the tube Yes battery packs No clip-on unless you got $$$ Buy thermal, kick ass -Most scopes have a runtime from 2-6 hours, depending on several factors but that seems to be the norm. Not like I can afford either but what would you guys run? It's so nice having thermal on head that I haven't bothered rifle mounting. Navigate with duals, spot something with the ecoti, and scope in with the rh25 in front of a LPVO. If you buy things used, that's even less likely. I’d consider a clip on thermal. I wouldn't recommend Night vision for 2 reasons. No helmet mount or scopes. imo it's best to have both Share Add a Comment This test was done on a Pitch Black night with No Moon and moderate starlight and no ambient light pollution etc (almost worst case for non-thermal night vision) at 65F and moderate Humidity (good conditions for the Thermal). Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Clip on thermal vs bridged . Also, IR marking. Looking forward to multi/hyper-spectral fusion devices being available. I run a Tig now and I have an xELR ordered too. Some things to remember; thermal can’t see through glass and has a significantly shorter battery life than night vision. Next we have analog night vision, or image intensification. Because of this, you can’t use them the same way. Hey guys! I am looking into getting a helmet set up for either night vision or thermal (or both). AGM Global Vision thermal monocular Taipan TM10-256 it's decent out to 200 ish yards and is at the 500$ price point. Mar 9, 2024 · Click on the green Night vision thingy and there's 182 pages of good advice dating back to 2010 about Night vision and thermal optics. Interested in getting into the night vision game but unsure whether to nv or thermal. Sep 27, 2023 · Thermal is amazing for spotting living creatures, or heat sources. Lower end thermal units will have trouble with identification due to lack of detail especially at range. There are a handful of us deep into the thermal game here. Thermal night vision Discussion. I only want to go clip on. It's just ridiculous. otkhkoe uoh esdkuwa paxxe upx otojr dknp qmjom ftafej iwfeu