Sony a7 iv review reddit. Unfortunately I can’t afford both.

Sony a7 iv review reddit But do customers want to see me coming with a phone to film?? Probably should buy the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Sony A7 IV is the best camera at this price Could visit Sony Aplha Blog and each lens review I have dabbled a good bit with HDR. When you include 3rd party, Sony has more/better 24-70 options, a 20mm 1. It used to work better in the past, on their old apps (play memories or something called like that). This alone is worth the IV over the RIV. Looking at the spec sheet of the A7 4, in terms of image quality A7R 3 should still have an edge in terms of resolution and detail. Meanwhile the iphone 15 pro max has a really good camera and is in total 1/3 of the price. I do notice the Sony is much better in low light at night so it’s my preferred night shooter. I kind of dislike the ergonomics of the Sony bodies (even Fuji bodies feel like toys compared to the pro Canon bodies I'm used to). Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 IV Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF So far I’ve found a lot of sports examples online with the Sony A9 ii and they are amazing. I had a video call with a guy who was having the same problem and said Sony wouldn’t believe him. I have a Canon 7D, so I have some canon glass already. The prices are insanely high (for a beginner). 5) has a 24-200mm optical zoom. I will use the camera mainly for landscape photography and videos, while I am out on wilderness backpacking trips, but also for city scapes and family photos / videos. Thats whats annoying to me. Why the Sony Alpha a7 Mark IV Fits Well. Let me know any other tips & tricks!! Firmware upgrade… Don't know how it is on any other Sony cameras. Better EVF, flippy screen, higher resolution sensor, new menus, much better AF tracking, dramatically better video specs, gyro stabilization, full HDMI out, focus breathing compensation. It has better codecs, better image quality for video, better video assist features, 10-bit color etc. 4, significantly better 50mm options, and a beautifully compact 70-180mm that has been my favorite lens as of late. A7 III / A7 IV are slightly bulkier, weight wise, after you add the lens, not that different just bulkier but a bit easier to grip. Now I decided to buy the Sony A7 IV with a lens, gimbal etc. A7 iv just freaking sucks What I also found while filming was that it overheats more when I set my aperture to higher numbers like 5 or 6. I am considering getting a tamron 28-200 mm (F2. The review covers in detail not seen in "mainstream" reviews subject such as: differences in auto white balance and exposure and it's impact on photo and video, autofocus in good and bad light, rolling shutter, Feb 10, 2022 · The a7 IV uses the same NP-FZ100 battery as the a7 III and other more recent Sony cameras. For most people photography is a hobby, and a lot of hobbyists like to buy more of a camera they they "need", because they enjoy using an advanced camera. That way I can set one card for RAW, and the other for JPEG, which increases write speed significantly if I shoot both. Thanks for the help. I once tried an a7 II and the feeling I had was that it was slower to focus and shoot than an alpha 6000. This full-frame mirrorless camera isn't trying to be as groundbreaking as its predecessor I noticed on B&H that the A7 IV is available for $2300 body only, so only $100 more than A7C II. I didn't respond and let it sit, waiting for the offer to expire. And while it may sound strange, but it is competing with the A7 III. 99, body only) is the eagerly awaited sequel to the popular a7 III from early 2018. Also, the Sigma 24-70 is a great value and the much more expensive Sony GM barely beats it in most cases. Posted by u/SuspiciousPotato98 - 2 votes and 7 comments The a7r iii prices are typically twice as much or maybe more, but they do not appear to be twice the camera. Hi y'all, I was looking into finally upgrading my old canon camera to something much better. S5 ii is a great camera but at the moment its price is not much lower than Sony a7 iv. The 33mp vs 24mp doesnt make a huge Difference Sony a1 or A7IV still can use your existing full frame lens to save your money. 8 And a 24-105mm f4 And a sony 50mm 1. My options were Nikon Z6, Canon R5 and Sony A7 IV. Again, the newest Sony, the A7RV is an amazing camera, and I suspect the A7V will be a home run when it launches. 8 “almost pancake” and the Tamron 28-200 on Sony’s system. Or check it out in the app stores Sony a7 IV initial review | 33MP BSI CMOS, 10fps, 10-bit 4K60p in Hey everyone. . On top of that, Sony does NOT lock the IBIS mech when you shut the camera off. use this site as he has pretty great reviews of the lenses and Totally not because you can buy the Sony A7R4 for pixel density. Sony a7 III is a great camera and absolutely capable. 8 Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. If you would like much better auto focus and higher resolution images, and can easily afford it, I highly recommend the a7 iv over the a7 III. I haven't purchased it yet, mind you. The Tamron lens is an APS-C only lens with excellent MTF numbers, little to no CA, and provides 3. The AF button alone is worth it. Feb 28, 2023 · The more I looked, the more I realized that if I was to swap to Sony again it would solve all my lens related issues. Hey guys, I haven't been in photography for a couple of years. " Not surprisingly, after two days, I received a counter-offer for $2399. planning to travel a lot this year and will take photos of national parks, wildlife, cities and family pics too. Apr 12, 2022 · The A7 III proved extremely popular with content creators, delivering both strong 4K video and stills. I like that the canon has gps data but I’ve heard the Sony has a wider dynamic range and has 5 shot bracketing vs canon’s 3. Also the kit with the 28-60 is available for $2500 so the same price as A7C II. & the color issue is definitely something I’m concerned about. Recently watched this video. This was the beginning of the end for my Canon gear. I was wondering if i should get the fuji x-h2 or switch for the sony a7 iv, they both look incredibly good but im wondering if the fullframe is really worth the + 500 euros for the sony a7iv. Im curretly super invested in photography and video, i need a hybrid camera that can do both at super high quality. An A7 IV or A7C should be good for your budget and purposes. Autofocus is brilliant too. Just ridiculously stupid and I'm so disappointed in Sony. 7 and the 14-140 super zoom. 6) but also noticed that the sony rx100 VII (F2. My thoughts: the a7 iv feels thicker on my grip. Thank you all for your help. But then the a7 IV is around $1000 less expensive than the R IV. my current budget is around $3000 (flexible) for lens. Own A7R 1 and A7R 3 and I will not upgrade. I was also wondering if there were alternatives, like the a7 iii, or perhaps even getting 2 different cameras (one for the pics and one for the videos) I am looking for a versatile camera lens that is capable of taking quality video and photographs in conjunction with the Sony A7 IV that I have on order. It's a usefully hefty unit that, combined with the relatively modest viewfinder res, lets the a7 IV achieve a CIPA battery life rating of 580 shots per charge using the rear screen and 520 shots per charge using the EVF. Anyone gone from iii to iv? Any feedback Review Im sure its been asked before I have a sony 85mm 1. The upgrade from A7 1 to 3 was worth in regards to autofocus speed, resolution and camera body - in almost any regard. For $6k you don’t even get a articulating LCD screen. There are relatively small differences in the shape and dimensions of the grip between A7 III and the new generation, but it feels substantially better, more ergonomical, larger, at least for my Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Post reviews, articles, and videos of products, unboxings, etc. There is not that much differences between a7 iii and a7 iv (i own both). Jan 31, 2022 · Thanks to Sony Canada for getting me a loaner of Sony a7RIV. Both are still perfectly capable cameras, but yea if you specifically want animal eye af, then the A7 IV and A7C should be on the shortlist. The Sony A7 IV takes this one-size-fits-all approach even further, with even better image quality, improved performance and a host of thoughtful design touches. Sony A7 IV vs Sony A7R IV/V to just agree with "buy a sony" since this is a sony reddit page. 8 and 12-24/4: Canon doesn’t have a 12mm so Sony wins by default. The 5d mkii is beefy as hell compared to the IV. They just don't have that premium SLR feel I'm used to and am I wrong or do the Sony bodies get beat up looking real fast (maybe due to the sharp corners). I’m looking to upgrade and can’t decide between the 5D mark iv or Sony A7 IV. As I read about the hobby, glass is the very important than body and so I need some recommendations for lens. This is a subreddit to discuss new cameras and camera comparisons, camera lenses, gear and accessories. I have a sony a7 iii that ive had for about 4 years. Sony a6400 + Sigma 18-50mm f/2. Been thinking about upgrading to a somy a7 iv One thing thst i dont like about the iii is the autofocus on mine seems a bit average. You can add magenta but the skin becomes "dead". Finally, we are where I originally wanted full frame mirrorless cameras to be. Sony is getting cheaper or gets on sale now and then as it's an older model now and Panasonic is priced as a new model. You should see there that the OM-1 and a7 IV are roughly one stop apart, while the X-T4 fits somewhere in the middle. I’ve heard about the overheating issue. Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M Post reviews, articles, and videos of products, unboxings, etc. I've spent the last two years or so using the Manfrotto compact, only to realize that it is too "weak" to keep the A7 IV + 70-200 in place. The Sony A7Siii came out with great video specs but the pixel count is just way to low, than they released the A1. 5-4 stops of stabilization (all the way to 300mm) -- better than Sony OSS lenses. 8 Sony A7RII + Sony 24-105mm f/4 and if you’ve money left maybe a 50mm or 85mm prime. The Fuji is shockingly good for video (offered 6k ProRes recording to my Ninja) where Sony does not. com for used gear Both sonys but especially the a7 iv have much better autofocus than the z6 ii which should be pretty useful for your usecases. Plus, if anything the A7 III probably has a slight advantage when it comes to low light because of the bigger pixels, which could be nice for those low-light scenarios in weddings. Mar 28, 2022 · The Sony a7 IV ($2,499. Buy an used A7 M1 or Fuji XT2 Body for 400-500 bucks and a decent lens and actually start shooting instead of getting tangled up in thoughts about what gear, how much and whatnot. ) Autofocus - While already excellent in the IV is simply an afterthought on the RV in my experience so far. Overall I still prefer my Fujis though. Camera Collection I also looked up in reddit regarding these 2 but Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Wondering if the a7 iii or a7RIV would have the same connection as the a7IV. I had the same issue and with advices/comments from professionals i decided to go with sony a7 iv. Ditto for the A7 III. Maybe get a cheaper a7iii if you really want to switch. Prices of a7 iii have fallen a bit to just under $2,000US, with a lens. Thanks! For the thorough review. Oct 21, 2021 · It doesn't. Another consideration is that the video autofocus in the a7 IV is light-years ahead of the RIV. For 2 lenses: Lens 1: 24GM or 35GM Lens 2: 70-200/2. Ofc Sony will be happy with whichever one of their cameras, but still. An A9 would be better autofocus and speed wise, but it lacks the animal eye af you're looking for. Now after some deliberation I came down to the Sony A7 IV or the Fujifilm X-T5 Sony pros: +flip out screen so I can make sure I am in focus if I journal +touch focus +Better autofocus (I assume) +Full Frame +better low light performance +nice lenses Sony cons: -Flip out screen worse for everything but video -Bigger I just picked up a new Sony ZV-E10 along with a new Tamron 18-300 for less than half the cost of a new a7 iv. , or Sony alpha DSLR. Had the same 2 lens duo as you, the vulnerable 20mm 1. Very new to the photography hobby and bought a7iv with kit lens. A minor technical nuances, like viewfinder, number of buttons and dials, etc - only relevant if there is some difference that is important for you. Since i mainly use wide lens, 10mm up to 35mm having the habillity to use the full range is quite important. So that actually could be the deciding factor as it seems people have been having more trouble with the a7iv than the a7iii as heating issues go. The only problem is I have watched tons of reviews and don't know which is better for me. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I considering changing to Sony I am looking at a Sony a7iv with a 70-200mm And a 24-105 mm plus a Sony 12-24/2. Was wondering if you guys could please recommend a good enough tripod that is both light and I guess relatively affordable (?) within the $300 USD range. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I was given a Sony A7 IV paired with the Sony FE 24-70mm F/2. Great for short presentation music videos, but it's not made for documentary or movies, atleast not as an A camera. You might be better off getting something around the canon eos 750D range. Now I'm looking at Sony. 8mm (D)], but with a deeper grip depth that improves the feel of the camera in the hand. It depends on how you edit, but Sony offers a very flexible raw image but it is harder and more time intensive to get the same results of a Fuji image. I didn't notice much overheating with the A7 IV, but the A7C II is smaller, therefore the heat will overtake sooner. Sony's reputation for poor ergonomics comes from the Sony cameras that most people are using (the a6 series and older a7's). It is, for example no better than the Olympus E-M1 Mk. The high-ISO noise performance of the A7 II is pretty bad for its sensor size and year of introduction (2015). Why? Greater lens availability both from Sony and 3rd parties like Sigma and Tamron. 2. I've been trying to find a Shutter Release Remote on Amazon but I don't see any saying for the a7 IV. What do you think about comparing the a7 IV with respect to the a6600 Thank you so much The app is extremely frustrating. The Sony is known to have allot of sample variation… I still use it, but the AF in "low light" situations is just unusable, so im planning on switching to a A7 III or IV, but im gonna keep the OG A7 for vintage lenses. But the f stop looks pretty poor at 3. As always, this is a completely independent review. They are definitely comparable but nothing the Sony wins out in is worth an extra 500 bucks imo. Additionally, the physical k1 is far more user friendly than Sony. Unfortunately I can’t afford both. 8, a significantly better 35mm 1. In my hands on, i tested both a7iii and a7iv with the same lens. The body of the a7IV is largely familiar [131. Money isn’t the issue. Right off the bat, I have the budget for both of these cameras and have been shooting on a Sony A6300 for the past 3 years, also have invested well into the Sony e mount and am really looking to upgrade for mainly the IBIS, autofocus, megapixel bump and the overall features that come with the full frame cameras. Note that the Sony color issues are not really a problem on bird and animals. Looking for an opinion of these two cameras :Sony A7 IV mirrorless vs Fujifilm X100 VI. ) High ISO - The A7IV performs about as well in low light as my A7RIV did. Most people looking for advice here aren't in the market for an a9, and it's a bit condescending to suggest that experienced photographers who don't like Sony are incapable of objective evaluation, and simply don't like The a7 IV is a vastly better video camera. Zooming in to where the graphs cross the 6 horizontal line, you will see they are fairly level with the OM-1 at iSO 3200, the X-T4 at ISO 4022 (practically 4000), and the a7 IV at ISO 6400. I currently use Sony a7 IV. 8 - 4. One time it started to fog up the image from overheating and I can't shoot 10bit anymore because it sometimes creates glitch artifacts on the footage. It’s tiny with the Sigma 18-50 compared to my Sony with Sigma 24-70. Not defending Sony, personally i dislike the a7 IV very much for it's crop 4k50fps BS, i think sony really cut some corners on this camera, but the a7 IV is a stills camera. We tried an A1, A7 IV and A7SIII. I have v60 one and I don't plan on shooting videos only high resolution photos not sure about bursts probably not gonna be necessary. The A7R II, A7 III, and A7 III are much improved in this regard. Have not tried the A7 IV yet. Sony Alpha A7 iv with Sigma 24-70mm F2. People will now think really hard whether they need what tue A7 IV can offer, or if they will be just fine with the A7 III in exchange of the lower price. But wanting to shift to a cinema camera, because of the work I have to do. The new app (which looks old anyway) does not connect automatically to the camera when the camera is turned on, thus the geo tagging fails. The 7RV seems to improve on the IV's quality in this regard so no meaningful difference between the 2 there and certainly no reason to pick the IV. I probably won’t buy a lens this wide so I don’t care Sony 16-35 f2. Given that I want to capture moments with my child, and kids don't always cooperate for photos, I believe the superior autofocus of the A7 CII, which better recognizes subjects and body parts, will result in more shots with correct focus in such Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. As i do work in the southeast primarily, i do have some concern with heat. the hybrid oriented body design of the a7 line is more suited for a content creation use case because it still retains all photo features while being video focused Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Sony A7 IV yes or no? Camera Question Post reviews, articles, and videos of products, unboxings I have a Sony A7iii and have been wanting to upgrade for so long. Sony A7IV is half R photography capability and half S videography capability. I do both video and photography. I agree I don’t love the way Sony generally looks compared to Fuji or even Cannon but I do mostly video & this camera seems better for video. Fuji simplifies the shooting experience at the expense of some features. So the a7R IV is 61MP, the a7 IV is 33MP. Just make sure to watch a few different reviews and comparisons. The focusing clusters on Sony are towards the center. Those were exactly the things I was interested in. Also, he doesn't mention a lot of the other features on the S5ii and doesn't do a real IBIS test actually walking around. Specs aside, the ergonomics of the A7 IV are just worlds better. It's people where the Nikon really sings, and our sensitivity to human appearance makes the Sony look the most off, imho. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Sony a6300 overheating days still haunt me to this day lol. 3mm (W) x 96. Not even close. 8 GM II ($2200) thinking, "There's no way any authorized retailer would accept that offer. Kit and 24-105 f4 G lens. The a7 iv is more like a better a7 iii. The only question I have is if the a7 IV is fast enough to focus and shoot. For travel, my preference would go to the A7C II, and not the A7 IV. Sony's full frame bodies have since increased in size ever since. With "low light" i mean a room with all the lights blasting, not real low light situations. So you're traveling a lot, which means size is a primary concern. I currently use (and love) the sigma 17-50mm lens, and this Sony one looks similar. Between the a7riii and the k1, one thing I like about the k1 is that I can focus at the corner of the frame, where as Sony is a bit difficult. But do customers want to see me coming with a phone to film?? Probably should buy the I shot micro 4/3 when my first was born. A7 IV all day. I was looking for a camera to buy so it could last me years as I begin my journey to go pro and found the A7IV and the A7R IV(A) as good options. Does Sony a7 iv crop at 4k 50p? or just at 60p I'm working currently in real estate video and photography and i'm looking for a camera that can do 50 to 60 frames without cropping. This is the reason I originally switched from Canon DSLRs to Sony mirrorless back in the days of the first gen a7. It's properly small and light. There's a mass-market series called a7 (II, III, IV) and a more expensive, higher res series called a7R (II, III, IV). I desire an easy load management (not awkwardly heavy to hold) camera while also having good quality photos for street photography. I’ve also heard good things about the a7r V, but can’t find an indoor sports review using it. I use both the prograde SDXC V90 II (300 / 250 Mb/sec) and a SanDisk Extreme pro SDXC V90 I (170 Mb/sec) on the Sony A7R IV. 8 - 5. They can be very good lenses but often cost less than their Sony counterparts (if there even is a Sony counterpart—the third-party manufactures are getting pretty innovative). Sony a7 iv or Fuji XT5 . Sony a7 iv vs cannon R5 . Sony a7IV Build, Handling, and Features. At the moment my setup is the sony a7 IV with a tamron 17-28mm. All you have to do is get it in your hands and you’ll know right away that it’s the right choice, especially shooting with telephoto lenses. 1. Expect them to fall more. I wouldn't know if the A7S III, A1 and A7 IV use that same body, or have upgrades (but seems to work with the A7R IV/A9 II grip, if I read correctly). Canon RF 15-35 ：Both should get the job done, neither really impress. Both the A7 IV and A7c ii are very capable and almost identical (with some minor differences). In some regions Sony is even cheaper. Sony does the opposite, the cameras are feature rich but the shooting experience suffers. Quite similar to a7Siii The rubberised areas felt a little rougher on the a7iv A gimbal is needed for Sony video, but you can definitely make things work hand held with a Nikon. [Referral] Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Not talking about paper specs since we already know it by now, from paper and youtube reviews, a7iv is better specs-wise. I wish somebody could tell if a 7 iv has same issue when shooting people in a environment with trees or O just ordered Sony a7 IV and was curious weather I need a new memory card or the one I have from my Sony a6600 will do. That’s actually why I also bought a A7 IV (used Fuji exclusively before that), because there was a lens for Sony that I wanted. Retail on the new a7 iv is reported at about $2,700US. With hesitation due to mixed reviews, I recently used Greentoe and made a ridiculously low offer on a Sony 70-200 2. So, I'm wondering if these cameras are even worth this high price or not. But, I have to say the biggest difference is the quality of the lens, and not so much the Sony A7 IV. If you shut off a Sony camera and move it around, you can hear little clunks and that's the IBIS mech moving. I've decided to upgrade from the canon 700d to the Sony A7 iv. 8 DG DN Art I've looked at other lens such as the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6. you mentioned fuji is amazing photography, so what i mean you save money if buy Sony full frame since you have old Sony full frame lens, instead of getting both new fuji camera + new lens. I don' know about a7 iv but my a7 iii has a a lot of green tint. See full list on petapixel. I have a Sony now, and I love it (A6000). Sony A7C ii vs A7 iv Discussion Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S I enjoy the Fuji for Street and travel shooting. If you go to Canon, you are locking yourself only into Canon glass. While the A6600 and A7 IV have very similar capabilities, the A7 CII seems to perform even better. com Jan 8, 2023 · I came across truly outstanding review of Sony A7 IV with comparison against Canon R6 mark II. Ordinarily, I recommend cinema cameras for filmmakers & videographers, but if you need superior low light performance, less rolling shutter (in APS-C mode) and shoot photos 10% of the time, spend the extra money and get the $2,498 a7 IV - or, if budget is an issue, get a renewed a7 IV body with a 90 day Amazon warranty for $2,259. Sometimes almost impossible to fix. Here's a more indepth video comparing it to the sony. It's slightly smaller, and the Eye AF is great. The other two cameras hit for the eyes but the A7IV kept getting lashes or nose depending on the angle. In the 2nd hand market, you can easily buy a Sony A7R4 for $1700 and get the same image quality as Sony A7RV. 4mm (H) x 79. My camera is on its way so trying to buy all the bits I need. Sony A7III + Sony 24-70mm f/4 or Tamron 28-75mm f/2. if you’re dead set on a video focused full frame body from sony, a7s3 is the more sensible option over the fx3 because you don’t need embedded luts, external raw or xlr inputs. The Panasonic price advantage is therefore not so strong and Sony has more and cheaper lenses to offer. Its faster, the Display is a bit nicer in some situations and the autofocus is faster and more precise in terms of eye tracking. The IV is a significant upgrade over the III. When it comes to the Sony body itself, you’ll find there’s a lot to love about it. 8ii + 2x TC is as light as it gets. Sold my a6400 & APSC lenses and used the funds to pick up an A7 IV. It's an appreciable difference. This works great for landscape shots as well as vlogging, but of course I am missing a proper zoom lens for distant objects/animals. 8 and Sony 70-350mm Prices might vary, but check out Keh. If you shoot outside and you have trees or grass around, the peoples faces look outrageous. Just completed the thought process and decision making. These became the Sony-Zeiss 35mm 2. 189 votes, 91 comments. II/III, which has a much smaller sensor, and considerably worse than the Canon 6D and Nikon D610, which are older. 8 GM II lens, and I have to say 'wow, what a difference'. People like me get the A7RV because of the tilt and flip-out LCD screen, the AI AF, the high-resolution LCD and viewfinder, and the 8 stops of IBIS. First of all, I'm coming from a 5D mkii and damn this camera is small! Too many settings so I'm a bit overwhelmed. My wife and me decided to pick it up again and we got the A7 IV. 8 vs. Rationale, Lens 1: When traveling usually “environmental” photos are more important, 50mm and above compresses the background too much. Also, just came back from a trip Great White shark Fuji and Sony do different things. To sum it up: the nikon has a bigger body / better ergonomics, which you might prefer coming from a d3300 (the a7 iv is better than the a7 iii in that aspect) and a nicer screen. It can do eye AF in video and tap to track with the touchscreen. On the first one I chose 2X128 Gb rather than 1X256 Gb on the second. In comparison video's I dont really see the difference. I know that's controversial, this being the Sony alpha section, but I started with an old canon DSLR (eos 450D) and learned on that, (the principles of photography and how to use "proper" cameras. Last year I was able to carry out a project for a customer who paid me with new hardware instead of money. I work at a popular camera store and we’ve definitely confirmed it’s an issue with the A7 IV. 3 or Canon RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM, which obviously have much better range, but I'm not sure the F4 would be enough for the low light conditions (happy to be corrected on this) Well, Sony has a really nice selection of lenses, and that’s definitely one of Sonys great strengths. In the case of Sony, you can use excellent lens from Sigma (as I do), Tamron and others, additionally to very high quality Sony lenses. 5, am I better off buying just the body of the A7 IV and a better lens to go with it? I'm new to Sony as I've made the switch from Nikon. In addition to Sony OEM glass, E-mount has a bunch of native lenses from third parties like Sigma, Tamron, and Samyang. vxwinj yheb wcoaypa qrocnw wlibzfjg opounb jiubi wfryh tok mej