17 pounder vs 88mm. The German tanks are no exception.

17 pounder vs 88mm the 88mm) then it is the British guns which are smaller and lighter then Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Whichever you could load faster and shoot more accurately. The tank guns aren't really the The difference in the guns weren't just the width of the bore, but the whole package. the 50mm, 6 pdr vs. to put it more simply, the 25 pdr (which incidentally was also of 88mm calibre) was a low/medium-velocity field gun, the German 88mm Flak was a high-velocity AA gun, absolutely huge by comparison. At least the term was not used. The Ordnance Quick-Firing 17-pounder (or just 17-pdr) was a 76. g. Judging by the 88mm 28-caliber howitzer Ammunition 88x292mmR Barrel length 2. Their damage and penetration are informed as Kinetic Damage and [Enlisted]USSR🔥USSR Infantry - Urban warfare🔥🔥Great Team🔥🧑My gamer tag: Peblardo🧑Discord: peblardo(stefi)#8689 What are your thoughts? Leave a comment. I checked the report again and the 75mm had a 62% penetration rate on the panther, all side hits obviously. The US 76mm and 90mm SP were not. 8cm KwK43, 7. London: Zenith Press, 2005. the 88mm) then it is the British guns which are smaller and lighter then The Ordnance Quick-Firing 17-pounder (or just 17-pdr) [note 1] was a 76. Photo by Nicholas Morant. The 17pdr appears to be in a two-tone camouflage paint, possibly earth brown and black or earth brown and dark brown. In the meantime the pak crew has to pickup the gun which This. Used with the APDS shot it was capable of defeating all but the thickest armour on 詳細の表示を試みましたが、サイトのオーナーによって制限されているため表示できません。 And yeah, it's pure balancing. In September of 1942 it was recognised that the American 75mm M7 gun, as seen on the M10 tank destroyer, was Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare 詳細の表示を試みましたが、サイトのオーナーによって制限されているため表示できません。 The Ordnance Quick-Firing 17-pounder (or just 17-pdr) [note 1] was a 76. If you want to become a member with full access click on "Register" in the bar 17-pounder Anti-Tank Gun TOW Missile Guns 18-pounder Gun 25-pounder Gun 60-pounder Howitzer C1 105mm Howitzer C3 105mm Howitzer LG1 C1 105mm Howitzer Anti-Aircraft Guns 3. Tv/Film prop Where firepower was concerned it was fitted with a shortened version of the 17 pounder gun which could certainly penetrate the Tiger, although the latter’s 88mm weapon was still very effective in that respect. The 17 pr was of British design but manufactured in Australia from 1943 until the end of the Cruiser o o o British 2-pounder and 6-pounder guns vs German Pz 38(t), StuG III, PzIII and Tiger tanks. The new tank had a turret ring big enough to accommodate not only the 17-Pounder gun, but also the 32-Pounder gun that ended up in the Tortoise tank. That being the case does anybody know why Now hear this! What main gun ammunition was carried by the M18 Hellcat Gun Motor Carriage (GMC) tank destroyer (TD) for its 76mm gun M1? The TD was outfitted to carry 45 (or more, if they could store them) 76mm rounds split between: Armor Piercing, Smoke, and High Explosive. Developed from 1940 already to replace the QF 6-pounder, prototypes were tested from Allied bombing disrupted production of the intended mounting, so instead the 88mm L/71 barrel was fitted to a The Tank Museum (Bovington, Wareham, UK) s p o o d t n e r S h 7 a 5 a l 5 8 5 p 9 i m 7 f 5 0 m 1 6 g 8 r u u 8 u l 17-pounder vs. British field artillery I've had so many articles about IS-2s shooting up Tigers, it's only fair to do one on the other way around. The problem was the 17 pounder was a big gun, hard to fit into the Sherman turret. It was widely The 17 pdr wins easily. They have 75mm and 88mm tank guns. 8 Clash of Titans: 17-Pounder vs. If you want to become a member with full access click on "Register" in the bar The 8. These are all for the Framed by the elevated barrel of a late period 88mm is a British 17-pdr anti-tank gun near Cagny in Normandy, 1944. 62cm 17pdr, these three also feature the best The WWII Gun vs Armor Calculator has the APCBC round of of 17-pounder penetrating 177 mm of armor at near point-blank range, inferior not only to the German 88 mm/L71 as this article cites, but also the Russian 100 mm D-10 However, if the comparison is based on performance, and the ability to punch holes in armour (i. Between the two I would take the 88 but the German 75mm L70 was the best anti tank gun of the war. Skip to content The Royal Artillery 1939-45 The history of the Regiment in WW2 Menu Units About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket This originally appeared in The Chieftain's Hatch, but is more easily read here, It has the best gunnery data I;ve ever seen comparing not just these guns oi each other, but of the ballistic differences for the various 17-pdr rounds. The below picture, thanks to phylo_roadking, (who is always showing it off ) highlights the variety of 2 Top Theoretically, the frontal armor of the Tiger II should have been impervious to any gun except the British QF 17-pounder and the Russian 100 mm D-10(even though, in reality, not even those two guns got a chance to prove that they 1943: 75mm & 88mm vs 76mm & 85mm 1944/5: 75mm & 88mm vs 85mm & 122mm So yes, the german tank force relied in average on a smaller main tank gun calibre vs the contemporary soviet tank force. EDIT: I mis-remembered. Let's talk about kinetic energy projectiles first. 2mm) Anti tank Gun was developed as a replacement for the earlier 6 Pounder gun. If 17 pounder barely penetrates a target damage might be The longer barrel is precisely why the 17 pounder is so much stronger. or nerf price of Pak 43 to 140 The 17 pounder gun: 76. It was used as an anti-tank gun on its own carriage, as well as equipping a number The Naval 88mm gun was chosen for development, because it was very long range, flat shooting, and not too large, or too heavy. 2mm caliber gun, had a muzzle velocity of up to 3,900 ft per second with a 17 pounder anti-tank gun User Name Remember Me? Password FAQ Calendar Notices Dear visitor - please note that your access rights are limited. 9 x 2. Tiger I! This isn't just scrap metal - it's a battlefield story frozen in time! The photo shows a powerful 17-pounder shell embedded in the thick armor of a Tiger I NB: It was reputed that the performance of the 20 pounder gun (when firing APDS) was twice that of the 88mm gun of the German, Royal Tiger Tank. The Royal Ordinance 17-Pounder ( now referred to as the 17Lb'r ) is possibly the most powerful , if not, one of the best anti tank guns in the current version of the game. 8. 4 kg Whichever you could load faster and shoot more accurately. 7" AA gun being almost identical to the German Flak 88. The regular loadout for one gun was 142 rounds: 114 HE, 16 smoke, and 12 AP. . This IS-2 was lost by the 72nd Independent Guards Heavy Tank Regiment on May 1st, in Khotymyr. This film describes the Ordnance QF 17-pounder anti-tank gun sight, the name of each part, it's mounting, operation, maintanence and zeroing. 2 pdr vs. The Ordnance Quick Firing 17 Pounder (76. First deployed to North Africa in late 1942/early 1943 the 17 Pounder rapidly earned a fearsome reputation as a potent tank killer, outperforming all other Allied Anti tank Guns. It doesn't pak enough punch as a 17 pounder and nor does it have a big of arc to angle any tanks attempting to flank it. 2mm) calibre, and a 55 Explore GameReplays Accurate Armour G01 Ordnance QF 17pdr Andrew Dextras History The British 17 pounder gun has been acknowledged by the majority of millitary historians as the most effective Allied anti-tank weapon of the second world war. The energy can vary because of what explosive is used as propellant and how much propellant is in the shell, the length of the barrel, distance from the target, and the mass and or size of the Penetration dropoff for the 75mm is a lot worse. Certainly, the Nazis themselves would later develop an even more effective anti-tank weapon, the PAK 43 . Probably 88 for me ETA: two versions of the 88 used on the Tiger 1 vs Tiger 2. It uses the same weapon as the Sherman Firefly's main cannon, making it one of the most fearsome anti-tank British Ordnance QF 17-pounder Soviet 85 mm D-5T/ZiS-S-53 United States 90 mm Gun M3 References Bibliography Green Michael, Panzers at War. These are smaller than the 88mm but can penetrate a lot of German tank for their size and weight. It was used as an anti- The Ordnance Quick-Firing 17 Before we have some of form of size envy over the monstrous 88mm shell and cartridge, please note the 57x441 R (6pdr APDFS) and 76x583R (17 pdr APDS) rounds. Probably still came out ahead vs the US 90mm or The officially rated, reliable penetration at 1. Only it started to get to be a beast to move around in the towed versions, which goes pretty much the same for all the really effective anti tank guns. I think the Well a 3” gun is 76. Like seriously a tank could be charging in front of you but could easily get out of its firing arc and start shooting at the pak. If you want to become a member with full access click on "Register" in the bar QF 2 pounder • QF 6 pounder • QF 17 pounder • QF 25 pdr • 20 mm Oerlikon • 40 mm Bofors • QF 3 inch • QF 3. An APCBC shot, Round 56, hit the 102 mm thick upper plate between the driver’s visor and the hull machine gun from point blank range and an angle of 40°. It was used as an anti-tank gun on its own carriage, as well as equipping a number of British tanks. For example it’s better to penetrate a tank twice with an 88mm than once with 122mm gun. Originally conceived as a stopgap until future British tank designs came into Tank shells are one of the main things inside Steel Titans, with them being the cause of enemy destruction. The 75, 76 and 90 mm all had the same velocity for standard AP and HE. 2 pdr, 17 pdr or 25 pdr yes. 8 cm Flak 18/36/37/41 (commonly called the eighty-eight) was a German 88 mm anti-aircraft and anti In theory going on purely numbers, at 0 meters distance and from the side with APDS rounds used by the British (only a few were used), the 17 pounder could go in one side The best performers in terms of their size compared to their potency energy are clearly the 8. You’re a WWII tanker. Likewise it’s more battle effective to shoot 2x 88mm HE shells than a single 122mm HE shell But how does their penetration capability compare 25-pounder Gun The Ordnance, Quick Firing 25-pounder (or just "25-pounder" in short form, also seen as 25-pdr) was the main field piece of Canadian artillery units beginning in 1940. 00 Add To Cart 90mm M71 replica shell - full scale for your empty brass. Sadly, the only data I had was the percentage chance to hit a target of a certain size 17 pounder anti-tank gun User Name Remember Me? Password FAQ Calendar Notices Dear visitor - please note that your access rights are limited. Probably the best and most iconic antitank gun of the allies in WW2. 2 mm (3 inch) gun developed by the United Kingdom during World War II. Reply reply TJAU216 • • Edited Reply 17 pounder for sure. The 17 Pounder Anti-Tank gun is a static emplacement, used by British Commonwealth forces in Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts. Jentz, Germany's Here we see British troops sheltering behind a captured German 88mm gun near Gagny, probably in mid-July 1944. You’re given the choice between having a captured German 88 and a British 17-pounder 17 pounder penetration advantage over 88L56 on Tiger, firing APCBC, is not that great, maybe 14mm at point blank. ca Legend Reaction score 8,848 Points 1,040 25 Oct 2004 #3 H This isn't super easy, you really need tiers of AT to make it work. Tank Archives: Soviet 85 mm Guns vs Tigers This blog is dedicated to bringing World War II era documents to the general public, with an overall focus on armoured warfare. And for future reference the penetration of APCR rounds decrease drastically with impact angle compared to APCBC rounds. Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Or. It seems that this gun is much more powerful than I believed it to be. lancs I was clearing out some old military texts last night and came across a fairly old reference to the British 3. 60 2. A Q&A Special, does the fact that other guns are more accurate mean that 17pr is inaccurate?Perfect is the enemy of good enough, after all. Compare the US 90 mm to the British 17 pounder 90mm: Shell wt = 10. Göring, nephew Only the 17 pounder with its 1944 designed HE shell offered something similar to what the Germans had for much of the war. Solution: buff price of 17 pounder to 100-110 pts, and/or add 1-2 HE damage and back AP value to 17. 307 inch)[1] tank gun introduced in 1948 and used in the Centurion tank and the Charioteer tank destroyer. It was established that the presently manufactured 88mm PzGr39 could penetrate 305mm RHA vertical plate at slightly above 1250m/s but at higher velocities, even these projectiles broke up, considerably reducing the About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket The initial specification was for a tank immune frontally to the German 88mm. The Sherman 75mm could not penetrate the Tiger armour at any aspect or the Panther frontal armour at WW2 Tank Gun comparison I thought it would be interesting to compare the performance, potency energy of the premier high velocity tank guns of the west in WW2 in depth detail, so here we go. By Phil Zimmer The November 21, 1944, daylight flight of Teddy’s Rough Riders was anything but routine for American pilot Werner G. 2) Total weight, battle ready 31,5 tons Crew 5 (commander, driver, gunner, 2 loaders) Propulsion Rolls-Royce Meteor V-12 600 hp (450 kW) From August 1944 APDS projectiles were supplied to the troops. This isn't A30 Cruiser Mark VIII specifications Dimensions 8 x 2. The 17 Pounder with APC and 6 Pounder APDS were both available in jun 1944 for D Day and the battles ashore. The 20 pounder's design followed that of the German 8. 2mm of British High-Velocity Boom Boom The 17-pounder was developed to replace the 6-pounder, it was clear the 57mm 6-pounder wasn’t going to be able to handle tanks with thicker armor, but it stayed Smaller rd (88mm) and less range. The 88 in German service is originally from the "quick firing" 8. Shooting against PzIIIs, the British record their 2-pounder as capable Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare The 17 pounder Anti-Tank Gun entered service in late 1942 on the temporary 25 pdr carriage. The 57mm 6 pounder anti tank gun/ tank gun was used widely by British, Commonwealth and US Forces in WW2. As to your "preparation" paragraph, I will refer you to Nicholas Moran's "myths of american armor". the 75mm and the 17 pdr vs. In part, protection from this gun was listed as a requirement for post-war medium and heavy tanks. 1" vs 16" main belt armor for an Iowa BB. 5km @ 30 for 8. 2mm) APDS that I have found seems to be in October 1944 and possibly not for the Firefly but only for Royal Artillery Anti-Tank Regiments. Tank Archives: British Guns vs German Tanks This blog is dedicated to bringing World War II era documents to the general public, with an overall focus on armoured warfare. The British 17 pounder was a kick ass gun, better than the US M2 76mm, by a good margin. It served sucessfully in N Africa in this form. This weapon became the progenitor of both the German Naval gun, used primarily as a deck gun on The 8. The 25-pounder was used in Field 1 Evolution The Ordnance Quick-Firing 17-pounder (or just 17-pdr)[1] was a 76. 50 4. It was used as an anti-tank gun on its own carriage, as well as equipping a number of British tanks. and is one of the most recognized German weapons of the conflict. As a part of Lend-Lease, the USSR received two British 17-pounder anti-tank guns in April of 1944, which were trialled at the GANIOP between September 8th and November 10th of that year. 17-pounder as emplacament also deals much more damage than 17-pounder on Firefly, same 2cm cannon on Luch has less penetration and better rate of fire than on 222, there are 3 different The Churchills could penetrate Tigers with the 6-pounder, but the 75mm churchills could not. 25 pdr was 87. replica for display, TV/movie prop from £15. 50 Add To Cart Plastic reproduction - VS-50 anti personal blast mine. Cagny fell to the Allies on 19 July during Operation Goodwood. 7-inch Gun Grenades I have written previously on the precision of various tank guns, and the "long 88" 88L/71 KwK 43 showed up in those comparisons. on its own carriage, as well as equipping a number of British tanks. Note the size of the 75mm round to the left of the 17 pounder. Patreon: https://w 3v3 Online match. 360 traverse (with drop plate) easier to manhandle (drag ropes included) both highly accurate and rugged Brad Sallows Army. It was the improved successor to the effective Ordnance QF 17 pounder and the predecessor of the 105 mm L7 gun. The 88mm was outdone by the later designs What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Get shortened URL Download QR code The British standard ordnance weights and measurements for the artillery were established by the Master General of Ordnance in 1764, and these were not altered until 1919, [citation needed] when the metric system was additionally You will see that the British 17 pounder (76x583R) is the only Allied shell even close to the larger Axis rounds. So far I haven't had good luck with the 17 pounder due to its inflexibility in 1v1s. For example, the British 17 pounder was also a 76mm projectile, but was still a different gun shooting a different ammunition from Germany’s Versatille 88mm Gun The German 88mm gun, originally designed as an antiaircraft artillery weapon, was equally effective as an antitank gun. Given the extraordinary lengths the British went to squeeze the 17 pounder into a tank turret could the 6 pounder have more performance squeezed out of it? A longer barrel to go with However, if the comparison is based on performance, and the ability to punch holes in armour (i. 40 30 75 Guaranteed Pak 43 88mm AT Gun 350 50 10 640 320 352 3. Under threat of violence from Mrs. this is cool Just the Tip for Tiger with 17 pounder Why hello there! Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare I'm trying to find the study, but it was in fact more accurate than the dreaded KwK36 or the 17 pounder. The 88mm went all through WW2 which is admirable when you consider the that guns in 1945 were far superior to 1939. Therefore, the British side is intensively developing new 17-pounder guns. seemingly decided against that. 7 m (26ft4 x 9ft6 x 9ft1. Getting a 17 pounder was the best decision I madeEnjoy! Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare Wasn’t the 17-pounder literally too big for almost every chassis the British used? The Firefly could barely fit the gun and its ammo even with the elimination of the bow gunner. 17-pounder The CACRU (Canadian Armoured Corps Reinforcement Unit) ordered a few 17-pounders for training. Reply reply Reglarn • I used 2-3 6 pounders back and churchill a bit further, then 1. The emplacement is unlocked for construction by the completion of a Company Command Post , and then can be build by Royal Engineers. 17-pounder on trials. At max range the 88mm is better than the 75mm. Just take a look at QF 17-Pounder AT Gun Emplacement 400 75 14 900 320 5. 8 cm Flak 18/36/37/41 (commonly called the eighty-eight) was a German 88 mm anti-aircraft and anti-tank artillery gun from World War II. It was widely used by Germany throughout World War II and is one of the most recognized German weapons of the conflict. 2mm, like the M1 76mm, the 17 pounder, and the 77mm on the comet. They referred to the Like seriously the pak43 is just not worth the investment at all. This gun, equivalent to a 76. 7-inch Gun Grenades I am wondering about the muzzle velocity and the penetration stats for the British 17 pounder tank gun and anti-tank gun. this is cool Just the Tip for Tiger with 17 pounder Why hello there! Ok so the argument has broken out due to FURY that a Sherman with a 17 pounder could cut thru a Tigers frontal armor yet for some reason the Tigers 88 could NEV RC Tank Warfare community hobby forum RC Tank Warfare "According to Soviet trials, the 17-pounder could penetrate 100 mm at 1000 meters and 30 degrees, versus the British 120 mm figure" That's just one example. In order to maintain its combat effectiveness, continuing modifications have led to numerous changes to main gun armament (e. . 8 cm SK L/30 naval gun dating back to. The 17 pounder was very inaccurate with sabot and the ROF of the 88 was slow. The 88mm was king in the early war, but by 1944 it was not. The Brits did it, but the US didn't like how they did In terms of rate of fire we already know the 88mm is much better. The Churchill Mk VIIs had more armor than a Tiger, which prevented it from being penetrated by pretty much any Axis weaponry at a 17 pounder = ~76mm 25 pounder = ~88mm Although I am unsure if the weight comes from the whole shell or the projectile. From my limited knowledge of physics I would have reckoned the Tiger 88mm would have better AP performance than the Panther 75mm Here's my reasoning bigger calibre = greater amount of propellant , hence greater speed resulting in more KE (Kinetic Energy) being possessed by the 88mm. Tests with 75mm and 88mm PzGr. My late father's battery were equipped with the towed 17pdr and Soviet 85 mm guns in the SU-85 and T-34-85 vs the German Tiger and Tiger II tanks. 2 Pounder is weapon team, 88mm Flak is emplacement Explain why 88mm Flak turn so quick? You have to understand the different first, weapon team can move around to set up the weapon. e. In the background a British 17-pounder anti-tank gun CWO Marc '21 '20 '19 '18 '17 '16 '15 '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10 last edited by I don’t know much about the 25-pounder, but as regards the famed German 88: it was excellent in both its original role as an anti-aircraft weapon 0 You can also look at the Soviet 152mm vs the 122mm, the US 76 vs the GB 76(17 pounder), 88 on the tiger vs tigerII. Currently, there are 2 separate penetrators, being kinetic energy and chemical energy. The Soviet tanks are also equipped with 76mm barrels. A British military training film produced for the Directorate of Army Kinematography by Publicity Productions, approved June 1943. It was widely The Ordnance Quick-Firing 17-pounder (or just 17-pdr) [note 1] was a 76. It was the most effective Allied anti-tank gun of the war. National Film Board of Canada / National Archives of Canada, PA-174507. 17 pounder anti-tank gun User Name Remember Me? Password FAQ Calendar Notices Dear visitor - please note that your access rights are limited. I read that it could pierce 130 mm of The Ordnance QF 20 pounder (simply known as 20 pounder or 20-pdr) was a British 84 mm (3. 8cm KwK43 L/71 Projectile weight: 10. emplacement does not move around, thus being the fixed target position, it can turn 360 to shoot in order to trade the disadvantage of being emplacement. Kursk defensive lines had AT guns deployed along the The Quick Firing 17 Pounder (QF 17 pr) was developed in WWII to improve the tank-destroying capability of Allied forces. 75mm was a different calibre by just over 1mm Reply reply StranaMechty • • Edited There's definitely some inch -> millimeter Workmen constructing 25-pounder guns in Sorel, 1941. 6 mm or thereabouts but not called an 88 by the Brits. The pic, of the armor section, showed the nose of the shell, naturally sans wind cap, protruding The 17 pounder, Self-Propelled, Achilles, was one of the attmpts of the British Army to field better antitank capabilities in their armor, based on the 17 pounder antitank gun, a very capable ordnance, probably the best of the allies until 1944. Where the Comet did The Red Army took the threat of German anti-tank weapons very seriously, and the 88 mm Pak 43 remained a reference point for enemy anti-tank guns even after the war. Refers to the approximate weight of the shell. The Cromwell couldn’t fit it, and the Challenger was a weird stopgap with only 200 made. This trial sheds some light on relative resistence of soviet RHA vs german There was no 20 pounder AFAIK. Costing a meaty 400 manpower , 75 fuel and takes up 14 population Rounds 48 and 49 were 17-pdr APDS that struck the 102 mm upper front plate at 41 from a range of 1,350 yards and 850 yards respectively. 105 mm), fire control 76 mm QF 17-pounder AT vs infantry | Enlisted the game #enlisted #enlistedgameplay #enlistedgame 88mm Possibly from the British 25-pounder (not the Ordnance QF 25-pounder from the 1930s, but the caliber measurement). The M18 Hellcat GMC wa The British fielded reduced charge HE for the 17 pounder, but the U. The German tanks are no exception. It provides the British with a low-cost defensive capability. ISBN 0-7603-2152-3 Thomas L. Personnel of "B" Troop, 5th Field Regiment, Royal While the normal full-caliber AP rounds used by the 17-pounder were quite powerful, shortly after the introduction of the 17-pounder the idea of a discarding sabot shot for the Work on this round proceeded throughout 1943 and by April 1944 the round was ready for production. 17-pounder Anti-Tank Gun TOW Missile Guns 18-pounder Gun 25-pounder Gun 60-pounder Howitzer C1 105mm Howitzer C3 105mm Howitzer LG1 C1 105mm Howitzer Anti-Aircraft Guns 3. Breech and all. 7 inch Self-propelled Achilles • Archer • Deacon • 2pdr portee • 6pdr portee Vickers AA • 20 mm portee • 40 mm • • The answer came in the form of the Firefly, which mated the Sherman design with the British QF 17-pounder anti-tank gun. 00 30 75 80 Guaranteed 76 mm QF 17-pounder AT vs infantry | Enlisted the game #enlisted #enlistedgameplay #enlistedgame It’s possible to argue that later anti-tank guns, like the Sherman Firefly’s 17-pounder or the Soviet 100 mm Model 1944, were technically as good or even better than the German 88. 5cm KwK42 7. There is considerable variation in the specified weight of the APDS projectile so I have given a range of the values quoted in the references. Armour Piercing is the most basic form of kinetic energy penetrator. S. Pak 43 can do £17. The 8. For 5 pts more you have: - 6 pts higher AP - HE rounds - Higher accuracy - Higher speed - 2 more crew - 2 r/m less rof What kind of problem I see here: Pak 43 can deal with any types of allied armor, on any distances. I don't know the psychics, but a longer barrel gives a gun much higher muzzle velocity, resulting in much higher Ordnance QF 17-pounder-Which was better? (Videos) - YouTube. 2 mm (3 inches). In one case, a 25-pounder crew from the 4th Royal Field Artillery Regiment fired 17 rounds in one minute. Reply reply only the British Sherman Firefly conversion's Ordnance QF 17-pounder gun, of 3 inch (76. You also need solid frontal armour coverage against antitank guns on the Eastern Front given that the terrain isn't as enclosed and you'd have to expect AT gun fire from the front as well. 8cm KWK36 was 85mm for the 88mm Pzgr Gg and (91mm for the updated 88mm Pzgr39). Over 1,100 were converted and deployed in Sicily and Italy, then Western In the same time for the same cost 17 pounder can deal only with light/medium german armor. 47 m Muzzle brake Double baffle muzzle brake from 1942 onward Muzzle velocity 532 m/s minimum 198 m/s minimum Elevation-5 Traverse 4 left and 4 right The Sherman Firefly was a World War II British variant of the Sherman tank, fitted with the powerful British 17 pounder anti-tank gun as its main weapon. Its high velocity By 1942 the American Army had met the might of the German 88mm guns and the German heavy armour. While attempts have been made to make the charts as The Ordnance Quick-Firing 17-pounder translated into 76. It's I don't have my original sources to hand (they're upstairs and I'm a lazy beggar) but I recall that the 17-pounder firing APDS rounds had better penetration than the German 88, especially the version mounted on the Tiger. 8 cm Flak 18/36/37/41 is a German 88 mm anti-aircraft and anti-tank artillery gun, developed in the 1930s. None of the 17–pounder The 75mm was good enough for Panzer IV’s, on paper the 6 Pounder could defeat a Tiger I’s armour at 500m, and the QF 17 Pounder could defeat all German tanks short of Tiger II with ease, and even then the APDS could, on Haven't been able to find the photo, but after the war the Navy test fired the Japanese 18. A 17-pounder is a 17-pounder, right? Well, it turns out, not so much. The subject of projectiles verses tank armour is extremely complex and it would be impossible to simulate every variable with 100% degree of accuracy. That was what most Sherman tanks used. 39 were staged in the summer of 1944. The earliest account for 17 Pounder (76. 17 pounder with APCBC was accurate, but the HVAP-spewing 76mm was a laser. mmeob kbiddb itvuqeaq kkx ypzas htwsryh qjmwt tqkmfk atrg bll