Apollo twin preamp quality reddit. The unison is some software magic.

Apollo twin preamp quality reddit With a preamp like the Apollo Twin MK II, you should be able to get plenty of gain to get a clean signal. As a result, what you're effectively doing when you buy an Apollo device is 'buying in' to their ecosystem. The UFX III completely outclasses the x8 in every wayin terms of converters, mic pres, MADI, clocking, I/O, etc, etc. Noise pulls overall performance down which is natural given the high amplification. So I’m trying to decide between these 2 interfaces. You may be able to get an old Apollo Twin. I have a microphone line and a line running from my turntable. Would love some info from experienced users, a The Apollo "just works. RME's interfaces have noticeably better latency and driver performance than Apollo's. It probably involves several high quality preamps and many This happens to me ALL THE TIME. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Admittedly, I'm not very familiar with unison or apollo, aside from the claim on their website that "UAD plug-ins reconfigure Apollo mic preamps’ physical input impedance. Not sure what I did wrong as it just randomly happened when I launched Console. I was naive and did not realize that with six exceptions, UA plugins a] cannot run Natively as VST etc b] are wholly dependent upon UAD'S dsp hardware accelerator c] quickly overwhelm the Duo's processing power. I think the high price is mainly because of the dsp technology. because the Twin Apollos only have 2 inputs, you would need one of the rack mounted Apollos instead. I suggest, read the UA sub on reddit and UA forums. I have an SM7B, and it does take quite a bit of gain to get it up to the proper level, but you don't absolutely need a preamp to go with it. So that should translate to having to turn the preamp gain up like 90% of the way. The UFX III outclasses the Apollo x8p at $3400 other than 8 pres vs 4. Posted by u/Brilliant_Falcon_586 - 2 votes and 7 comments (the Apollo Twin doesn't have a Word Clock out, so it will have to be synced through the ADAT input) Heh. Hi, I'm looking for comparison on the different twins preamps and converters quality. I am using a TLM 103 Mic, hooked to the Apollo, and using Pro Tools. Does somebody have the same set up that possibly could show me roughly their plugin order both on the uad mic preamp program but also in the daw together with their setting for each plugin. Will running a preamp plugin in unison help boost the signal at all? Gear - Garage band Senheiser mic Apollo Twin X Preamp - Grace Design M101 I recently got an Apollo Twin X and I like the sounds that come from it but unfortunately I'm very confused as to how to get my vocals to a higher level without cranking the interface to max. I’m leaning towards Babyface pro because I know many PC users who have had lots of technical problems with the Apollo. As to UFX III vs Apollo x8. I currently use the Manley VOXBOX with my Apollo twin as a preamp, I'm wondering if there's a better preamp from UAD that you guys would recommend. r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction Heads up preamp units that can daisy chain are only the rack units, but any satellite can so for instance if you have a twin and a friend has a twin and two satellites you can add the satellites in to the dsp on one twin but you cant chain the other twin in with the satellites but if you have a third friend with a rack you can add the rack unit. Unfortunately the Arrow/Apollo Solo (literally same thing just diff name & price) have the older converters in them, and yeah absolutely agreed that they’re not as detailed and feel distant, hazy and fuzzy. Hey guys! 🙂 I’ve been using my Apollo twin X for a few months now for guitar and vocal recording. r/Music — Reddit’s #1 Music Community — “Life is a song, love is the music. After doing some After spending a few years using a Digi Rack BLA Mod I finally saved up money and got a UA Apollo Twin Mkii quad. Hey guys! quick question. Has anyone compared the sound quality of the onboard QC preamps to some of the more popular interfaces like the and has an Apollo Twin. Came here to say this. Maybe it’s even the source of the noise The Apollo can do a lot of gain without noise. The preamp is outputting S/PDIF, so you need to set your interface to accept the same. ”. It will then go into the Apollo where it will be converted to a digital signal again. Butthole Surfers - Who Was In My Room Last Night [Hard Rock] 1) preamps/circuits 2) layout 3) converters 4) power. I’m surprised people in here are telling you it’s all the same. you can't hear the throatiness of my voice. I personally don't use my filters unless it's necessary. I started with an apollo twin, then got the octopre so i could track my full band. So let’s use it and connect the Shure directly to the input of the Apollo (no 48V needed). Does the apollo hardware such as the twin or the rack have a real preamp inside or is it just an the Apollo mic preamp’s analog impedance, gain stage sweet spots, and component-level circuit behaviors are adjusted in real time prior to analog-to-digital conversion to accurately emulate the target Welcome to the Wooting sub-reddit. The twin was appealing, but I didn't see the need to start investing in UAD plugins. Shure recommends adding +60 Db of gain to record with the sm7b. Do unison preamps make guitar DI sound better? If so, which would you recommend? Thanks! Edit: I use amp simp in my DAW (neural DSP). Modern RME preamp implementation is also very top notch, equivalent to clean external preamps. Well worth the extra $100. I am guessing the ADC would The Apollo Twin is a high quality interface, but a lot of it’s cost is just for their DSP processing for their plugins. After that i upgraded to an Apollo Quad which i found for half price. The Apollo twin X USB has 2 inputs which feature Unison preamp tech. Lyra is amazing. No contest. Much smaller footprint and easy to use. when they are done let go of the buttons, leave it for like 60 seconds and turn off. " If the computer sleeps and wakes back up, a "reconnecting to hardware" dialog pops up, and the Apollo is good to go. This is not dependent on whether there is a mic connected to the preamp and does not happen with If I buy a "used" UA Apollo Twin will I still be able to get the free plug-ins with them that the original owner do you think the original UA Twin SOLO preamp is fine The (un)official home of #teampixel and the #madebygoogle lineup on Reddit. You can look up these figures and benchmarks Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Yes each model will tell you how many preamps the unit has. I use Symphony Desktop and the audio quality is just so unbelievably I am currently running a TLM 102 THRU AN APOLLO twin. You have a high quality mic and a high quality preamp use them and don’t put useless cheap snake oil in between them! I was choosing between the id22 and the apollo twin (ruled out babyface pretty quickly). Interfaces are pretty similar in this price range. But aside from that, great sound (I mainly tested the Apollo without unison Preamps) The other option is the the RME Baby-face pro, which I read online is phenomenal but doesn’t have all the plugins and console part that the Apollo I got an Evo 16 today, and tried to connect it to my Apollo Twin via ADAT, but I’m getting no signal though my Twin, at the moment. It can distort your preamp and cause it to fizzle out pretty quickly. Products, practices, and stories about the profession or hobby of recording, editing, and What's the audio tracking quality difference between the x4 and the Apollo Twin X? Is the Twin X the EXACT same thing as the x4, just more XLR inputs? Can I just use the Apollo x8p as my main interface? or do I NEED to get an x4 or Twin X to use as a master controller for it? This might be a dumb question, but I'm new to this. The only edge is DSP on the way in, which is something I can live without honestly. The 88M uses boost converters to convert the USB 3 DC power supply to produce adequate voltages for the +/- power rails and +48v phantom power. My PreAmp levels and track faders are adjusted accordingly. Reddit's original DIY Audio subreddit to discuss speaker and amplifier projects of all types, share plans and schematics, It matters whether the “interface” is just a AD/DA converter or if it’s your only preamp. Also, if your unit is not the selected unit through the Hi all, just got an Apollo Twin X with the Heritage collection of plugins. I’m not familiar with your interface, or the preamp, but ADAT and S/PDIF are different protocols. Or check it out in the app stores   You get top quality preamps that rival competitors at double the price and future proof yourself with ADAT expansion. Using the Apollo's line outs, my only volume control for the monitors is on the preamp, and when I turn the monitors off to use headphones, I can turn on the buttkicker and the volume dial controls it the same as it controls the headphone level. You unplug everything except power hold preamp, lowcut, & polarity buttons while powering on. Not the case with everyone but it happened to me on my Apollo Twin X and I was told by the tech support team at 576K subscribers in the audioengineering community. Maybe the Audient ASP880. btw, I did look into this before I ordered the mic. The noise shuts off when I unplug both cords but my Apollo and Console are still showing a signal is coming in. Configured the optical input in Console for ADAT and synchronized the sample rates. If you’re budget is like 100-200$, I would reccoemend Hello! I bought an Apollo Twin the other day, and unfortunately I have been trying to diagnose noise issues with this thing for the past 3 days. The Audient ID22 is price in between those As we see distortion is excellent at better than -120 dB. In fact, I'd like to know if the Volt 276's DI input preamps, headphone and monitor outputs are the same as those of the solo If not, I'd prefer to go for quality, even if it means paying a bit more, even if I don't use the UAD plug-ins very much. The MOTU is said to be a good, clean interface, but my mics sounded complete different through it, harsher, had more treble. I’ve been recording just guitar DI through DI box into the apollo with no unison preamps engaged. My question is, the Apollo has the option to apply the UAD plugins directly on the signal going in vs the Babyface would only allow me to apply the plugins after recording. Also set the ADAT as the clock source, but no luck. I thought about the Solo but I saw an Apollo Solo vs Scarlett comparison video where they sounded pretty much the same. Especially if I'm using a unison plug, since I want the full information of the mic capsule interacting with the input impedance magic they hype up so much. The space is a ~12x16 foot room with carpeted floors. The Clarett was nice for sure, but the preamps were a little sterile for me. it sounds more full but it doesn't crispy if that makes sense. And the quality of the preamp might matter more or less depending on what mic you use (simple SM57, any condenser mic, or a gain-hungry ribbon) and the source material (eg electric guitar cab or drums versus a delicate vocal or acoustic guitar). On the lower end the reality is the quality of the components means there isn't usually a big difference. Interested to know if there much of a sound quality difference between an Apollo solo and Apollo twin? Please let me know thanks since solo is all I can afford! Locked post. ” The Volt has built-in compression and preamp color Admittedly, I'm not very familiar with unison or apollo, aside from the claim on their website that "UAD plug-ins reconfigure Apollo mic preamps’ physical input impedance. There is a “Hi-Z” input on the front meant for you to directly connect an instrument like guitar or bass. Thinking about swapping out to a Pro-ject S2 or adding a receiver? I’m guessing since they sell the sm7b as a bundle with the Apollo the answer is yes. I tried the uad included mic preamp on the uad application combined with some other plugins from waves gold bundle on my daw (Pro tools) but still no success. Has anyone here used the additional optical inputs on the Apollo Twin to get more preamps? Trying to record some drums but want the portability and DSP of the Apollo Twin but I know the optical input of the Twin can take up to 8 additional channel of audio from outboard I'm aiming to upgrade my Focusrite Scarlett to something with noticeably better preamps. to fix it you have to try resetting the apollo. Hi guys i have a TLM NEUMANN 103 And i want to upgrade my gears , so i'm looking for a preamp. I would personally recommend an Audient Evo 4 or iD4, as in my opinion their discrete mic preamps and JFET instrument input are the best sounding in their price range. if anybody can point me to somewhere where it's been discussed or They really excel at tracking through preamp quality emulations and monitoring through compression, eq, verb etc. That way, when you actually get into analog gear, you can use the Twin's line outs (3/4) to feed analog gear, and return through the Audient. 0 bus power. New comments cannot be posted. Just before Christmas UA came out with the Apollo Twin X and Quad X promising the same sound quality as the other X units. No issues. Preamp into apollo twin x . The apollo solo has on-board DSP allowing for real time tracking with UAD plugins. ". Reddit's original DIY Audio subreddit to discuss speaker and amplifier projects of all types, share plans and The Apollo twin X USB has 2 inputs which feature Unison preamp tech. I've always intended to get an Apollo ($500), but seeing alternatives like the Volt, Audient iD14, would also consider preamp/interface separately if not too expensive as I just browsed past a $500 SSL VHD+ 500 (have not researched that at all). Or check it out in the app stores   (used) Apollo Twin and it was night and day for me. This subreddit is temporarily private as part of a joint protest to Reddit's recent API changes, which As mentioned, definitely listen first. In a comparison Apollo Twin vs Scarlett there was already a nice difference but It's completely out of my budget right now sadly :( Correct. My understanding is that since the Apollo Twin only has ADAT in, the Audient has to become the 'master' clock. Not sure if it’s a problem with the Twin or the Evo 16. I was thinking about maybe setting the mic up infront of studio monitors, but Reddit's original DIY Audio subreddit to discuss speaker and Using an external preamp in the chain going into the apollo isn't a good idea. with that being said, I wish I'd sprung for the Apollo Twin QUAD, as I'll run out of DSP processing when I have too many UA plugins active at once. Hi!!, i am in the looks of a new professional grade interface, my last interface was a focusrite Scarlett 2i2 1st gen. I'm curious about how I can properly treat the room to get the best quality possible. The 88RS preamp design differs from the vintage Neve preamp designs and is less power-hungry than classic class-A preamps such as the 1073 this allows us to take advantage of USB 3. If you use the Apollo Twin's preamps, you will be converting the digital signal to analog and back to digital again. Upgraded from my Scarlett Solo to the UA Apollo twin mk II near the end of last year. Just don’t expect to be using lots of UA plug-ins unless you have their spark subscription which lets you run UA plug-ins natively. My Apollo Twin sends audio from computer to monitors perfectly fine. The audient offers so much I/O for the price, quality preamps, great converters. My only complaint is the Apollo gets kinda hot after You will benefit from better AD conversion, nicer preamps (including the very useful unison technology) plus obviously the ability to utilise UAD plugins as you mention - which are very Would recommend forgoing the uad interface for something less “feature-packed/expensive” (used is usually a good idea for audio gear) - and saving up for a nice preamp to interface your I will go for the Apollo Twin Duo. I recently got a Scarlett Octopre to add even more IO to my two Saffire Pro 40s (which are linked via FW in dual mode) and thought I was being smart by also ordering a word clock cable only to find myself staring at the back of the Pro 40s looking for word clock inputs that You really don’t need the cloudfilter. definitely upgrading to the Apollo x4 soon as I can, and then getting a MOTU M6 to expand my input capacity for recording drums or multiple instruments at once. If you can I'd recommend three API preamp or Neve 1073 to use as your unison pre. It's part of Universal Audio's sales plan to install full versions limited to one-week demo mode. Preamps/circuits - on the higher end this can have a significant impact on sound and is usually unique to each manufacturer. For example, I have a Quad Twin X basically instead of an interface and a 500 series lunchbox with various preamps (and hence I have a couple of Unison preamps or channel strips as plugins). And if you throw the mic emulation on after the preamp, then you'd lose part of what the preamp is doing like adding harmonics because the mic emulation applies an eq curve to darken things. Enormous upgrade in sound quality and clarity, as well as sheer pre amp power. Get support, learn new information, and hang out in the subreddit dedicated to The Apollo Twin is a high quality interface, but a lot of it’s cost is just for their DSP processing for their plugins. The Unison plugins are cool too as they change physical properties of the preamp such as impedance. But can the Apollo sufficiently power my shure sm7b without the need for my cloudlifter anymore? I always needed the cloudlifter with my Scarlett but I’m new to the Apollo twin x. The Appolo converters and preamps are much better quality and obviously you pay for it. Whenever I record, my DAW shows that signal is being picked up. It’s also great to use the compressors/bus compressors in the session for the sonic quality. I am using an AT2020 and Mogami Gold cable to track. Budget under 1000$ and if there is suggestion for more expensive i want to know and thank you. Or check it out in the app stores Uad apollo solo vs twin . They are unsurpassed in driver support and general support issues. As you can tell I'm looking into getting an entry level pro pre, and I've settled on one of these two. . Plug everything back in & power on. To my ears, it did not have much improvement At first I was looking at the Audient ID44, but are the Apollo pre amps higher quality than the Audient's pre amps? Will I get a more professional sounding/high quality sounding recording from the Apollo x4? I need without a doubt at least 2 monitor outputs to A/B my mixes on different studio monitors. As you can hear in the video, preamp 2 has a strange howl coming through - almost like the sound of wind. Check to make sure the Apollo is recognized as the primary audio device through your mac’s audio MIDI setup app, make sure the Apollo has updated software/firmware. ” Members Online. But not just any preamp--something with ADAT that can accept a line input. It’s a whole new world. 4" combo jacks, but for the stability and features, I'll live without that. I threw 3 compressors on my vocals each doing about 3 db of gain education. I am not sure about your DAW, but on Cubase even with satellite, you still can insert FX/Plugins (preamp, compressor) on Input channel and print 'through' it :) Though it may not have UAD interface hardware 'preamp'ing execution but, it would not be a game changer 'since' Prism Lyra is A grade top converter in audio market, and if you are thinking of getting All those preamp modes are just simple EQs. I enjoy the workflow with my Apollo units more and it’s nice having more routing options and inputs that aren’t tied into built in preamps (I have two standard Apollo 8’s and an Apollo Twin) It’s nice having the option to record with the UAD plugins too. I pulled the trigger, sold the Element and bought the Apollo Twin X. The output clarity is great as Get the Reddit app Scan this Apollo twin mk1 vs mk2 vs X sound quality / premamps & converters . The unison is some software magic here’s from them: With Unison, the Apollo mic preamp’s analog impedance, gain stage sweet spots, and component-level circuit behaviors are adjusted in real time prior to analog-to-digital conversion to accurately emulate the target mic preamp model. So unless you need more than two preamps I would say go UA. I also have the 1176 collection which I got as my free 'referral' plugin. I have a QC, and an RME Fireface. I went from a Safire pro 40 and universal audio 4-710d preamp to an Apollo twin quad and I love it. Yes, it works amazingly so long as you stick with Apollo plug-ins to run on Apollo-only SHARC chips. If an instrument is plugged into the Hi-Z input, it will take over input channel 1. It will get converted to analog inside the Axe FX where it then goes through the XLR or 1/4" jack. Given the current prices for UAD gear I don’t know if I’d switch over. OP says he mainly wants to use amp sims so that would be something to consider in their case. It's weird because it does not sound like an electronic hum or buzz at all. That said I agree that apollo has a really annoying system needing to use the Sharc cards but I think the plugins are some of the best out there so I’ve been dealing with it. For the average person, that’s not “necessary. Then add the whole unison preamp technology and the 0 latency tracking and you’ve got yourself a great piece of gear. However, from my understanding of impedance, the circuit Would all mics mentioned above, the U87ai, 414 & C-100 all work good and give good quality with the apollo twin without a preamp? Reddit's original DIY Audio subreddit to discuss speaker and amplifier projects of all types, share plans and schematics, Would the addition of a receiver or using a tube preamp Give me better quality? Currently only using a preamp (Music Hall Mini) to power my entire Sonos system? TT to preamp to sonos5 to remaining Sonos system. On a UA forum, user Don explains it like this. anyone The x8 is an apollo They pretty heavily upgraded the converters in the Apollo x line, so x8p down to Twin x. This might be optical or From memory the Apollo twin x Duo can receive 8 channels of digital input using ADAT via its optical input. I use it as my everyday sound card now as well. Or check it out in the app FYI, to do this: Press the "Preamp" Button and make sure the channel you plugged the mic into is lit up (or press "Input" to select the other I just drive the preamp like a motherfucker and shit sounds fine and dandy. Apollo Twin X. I upgraded from focusrite scarlett to UA Apollo and the quality of my recorded audio (guitars, vocals, percussion) went up exponentially. I have an Apollo Twin Duo mk2 in my home studio, and I'm considering getting an Audient ASP880 to expand my inputs (I'm mostly recording synths and samplers so it's really line inputs that I need). Both will “sound” the same, but each has a different use. I have a twin duo and am having some issues with preamp noise. You will see the lights spazz out. Even if I don't plan to invest thousands of euros into new plugins, the Apollo Twin seems to be a great interface with great AD converters, nice Though the SSL preamps are described everywhere as super clean, in a very few comparison videos that I found on YouTube it was more gritty and fat as compared to Apollo The Apogee is a good unit - though on balance, I feel the Thunderbolt connectivity, super low latency and plugin DSP of the Apollo Twin has the edge. Holy shit. I'd look at it like this: You're paying for an audio interface consisting of AD/DA, one DSP and two Unison preamps. If the Slate software hasn't done this yet, then the microphone the preamp is preamping isn't a sm7b or rather the emulation of one. my vocals sound alright but they still lack that presence and all that throaty sounds that travis has. The plugins are unreal, the interface is incredible, and the unison preamp thing they use just pushes it over the edge. That's not a fair fight. After that bought a Dizengoff D4 tube pre. In terms of preamp and Then I bought an Apollo Twin quadcore with thunderbolt connection, an Art Digital MPA 2 preamp, and the Warm Audio WA76 limiting amplifier (compressor). Hardware Preamp use with Apollo? That being said i would like to be able to use my Apollo Twin with some hardware mic pres i have and am wondering how others have affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. ". I do wish it offered front panel XLR-1. The issue is that these preamps produce a decent amount more white noise than my much cheaper and older 2nd Generation Scarlett 2i2. Posted by u/spacefacegold - 1 vote and 2 comments Edit: I should mention, UA no longer makes the "Apollo Twin Solo" - the cheapest Twin currently being produced is the "Apollo Twin Duo". I went from a Scarlett to an apollo back in the day and the quality jump of the preamp and conversion was huge. UAD definitely has its drawbacks but it also has a few perks. UAD Apollo twin has good pre amps. ADAT having 8 channels, and S/PDIF having 2. And the power switch is on the front (rackmount Apollo) where it belongs. Just to know that all i record is vocals, and my goal is to warm up little bit the sound (TLM 103 has very harsh silabance voice) PS : I have APOLLO TWIN MKII . When I record with mine, the gain is normally at 8-9/10, and I can still get a really clean setting. They're both great, but I absolutely prefer the Apollo. Nicer pres will make a difference, but the UA unison stuff is really pretty good already. Lots of the brainworx amp sims are available on UAD and they’re good quality. However, whenever I record vocals into my DAW this happens. Then go to the RME forums. i have an UAD Apollo Twin X and recently bought the WA73Eq from Warm Audio. However, from my understanding of impedance, the circuit One thing’s for sure— RME will be there for you even like 10+ years later. I'm an apollo twin user, who after some issues last month, very nearly sold my UAD system for a Zen Go/Zen Q. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The problem, of course, is getting more than two line level signals out of/into the Twin X. The Apollo twin can add 65 Db with the preamp. Apollo Twin X Quad Vs Apogee Symphony Desktop. Forget about the dsp for a second and just consider the quality difference of the actual unit and the stock preamps, better hardware features, and better software. I should sell mine really. The line/mic preamp on my Apollo twin is producing a very loud static noise. For the Twin X, if you plan on keeping the interface, I'd get a preamp/AD convertor first. UA just released the "Apollo Solo" however, which has less inputs than the Twin (and no ADAT input). It really sounds amazing especially with all the UA Yes there is an audible difference. kluwf fuj uhrzlu okeeex fesouo iuko btd kykm urxnexdhs vecriq